There is no standardization for non-destructive edits beyond some minor stuff like crops, and even less for how they are saved (in a catalog somewhere, sidecar file, format of sidecars, inside DNG, is DNG even supported). Remember - that a program might allow you to do it technically does not mean it is license conforming. But I'm not sure you can get both of those legitimately - someone more versed in the nuances of adobe licenses will have to comment. If you can, with bridge (and I didn't know that for sure either) together they make a decent little browsing and editing system, at least they did pre-lightroom, unless Adobe has broken something. I'm not sure if you can get ACR free or not. But it's not a good solution if your 3rd party programs are non-destructive tools, it loses that nice feature. So if you wanted to use destructive editors, or let them work and render TIFF's or JPG's, then Bridge could brows them, display them, and I think even invoke the editor (I have not used it in a long time to be sure). not be a pure non-destructive editor) and then Bridge can read the standardized TIFF format (probably - it's possible to have all sorts of proprietary stuff inside a TIFF, I cannot say everything can be rendered by Bridge). To do that you need Capture One to (for example) render the result as a TIFF (i.e. If Capture One did non-destructive edits and did not output a preview or TIFF or JPG file, then Bridge would not be able to show the Capture One edts. Let's say you used something like Capture One with Bridge as a browser front end. Adobe's raw processing techniques are only compatible between products, so the edits in Bridge work with Lightroom and also with Photoshop (maybe some others), they will not work with non-Adobe applications that are also NON-destructive editors.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |